Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Dunstan
Тема Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension
Дата
Msg-id CAPPfruy84TCv0k-7FW1GYS0sGyUvEXmuMruno-NBR_Fo3dXSeA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Ответы Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension
Список pgsql-hackers
A definite +1 on this feature. A while ago I got partway through hacking the hibernate postgres dialect to make it issue a RETURNING clause to spit out the primary key before I realised that the driver was already doing a RETURNING * internally.

On 10 June 2014 05:53, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote:

> I was wondering that myself. I think it's certainly reasonable to expect
> someone would wan RETURNING SEQUENCE VALUES, which would return the value of
> every column that owned a sequence (ie: ALTER SEQUENCE ... OWNED BY). ISTM
> that would certainly handle the performance aspect of this, and it sounds
> more in line with what I'd expect getGeneratedKeys() to do.

Keep in mind that not all generated keys come from sequences. Many people have custom key generator functions, including UUIDs and other exotic things like Instagram's setup [1].

RETURNING GENERATED KEYS perhaps, but then how do we determine that? Any column that was filled with a default value? But that's potentially returning far more values than the user will want - I bet 99% of users just want their generated primary key.

The spec is a bit vague [2]: 

    Retrieves any auto-generated keys created as a result of executing
    this Statement object. If this Statement object did not generate any
    keys, an empty ResultSet object is returned.

    Note:If the columns which represent the auto-generated keys were
    not specified, the JDBC driver implementation will determine the
    columns which best represent the auto-generated keys.

The second paragraph refers to [3] and [4] where the application can specify which columns it's after. Given that there's a mechanism to specify which keys the application wants returned in the driver, and the driver in that case can just issue a RETURNING clause with a column list, my gut feel would be to just support returning primary keys as that will handle most cases of e.g. middleware like ORMs fetching that without needing to know the specific column names.

Cheers

Tom

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tests for client programs
Следующее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins