Re: Autovacuum of independent tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Holzman
Тема Re: Autovacuum of independent tables
Дата
Msg-id CAPNViJpzAQ9ZCsgTW190A7Mvh=dd1dYF403OAV6+3C2PDbaeqA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Autovacuum of independent tables  (Ravi Krishna <srkrishna@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: Autovacuum of independent tables  (Ravi Krishna <srkrishna@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-general


On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:52 PM Ravi Krishna wrote:
 

Interesting. Are you telling the Oracle version of the code had no intermittent COMMIT and relied on one
final COMMIT at the end. Even in Oracle developers must have planned for commit since a long running
open transaction can lead to “snapshot too old” error.

Yes, I am saying just that. With one important clarification: there were no transactions as SELECT does not open them and the application does not change anything on that connection.
So, no 'snapshot too old' and no COMMITs.

--
Regards,
    Michael Holzman

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ravi Krishna
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum of independent tables
Следующее
От: Ravi Krishna
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum of independent tables