Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Wood
Тема Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes
Дата
Msg-id CAP6d-HVctXZkBOz+KxY+vSTw9Ct5FCvSbXF9PKK2kGuFhh=MfA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-novice
No, you misread that, but Tom has already replied to his other message.

On 8/29/12, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:33:22AM -0400, lsq@nym.hush.com wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> After an upgrade to 8.4.12 from 8.4.10 we vacuum/analyzed the db.
>
> You downgraded a server?  Depending on the fixes in minor releases, that
> might not work.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> Postgres is running in standalone mode at this point.
>>
>>
>> vacuumdb --echo --analyze --all --verbose -U sysdba
>>
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    INFO:  analyzing
>> "information_schema.sql_features"
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    INFO:  "sql_features": scanned 7 of 7 pages,
>> containing 649 live rows and 0 dead rows; 649 rows in sample, 649
>> estimated total rows
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    WARNING:  using index "pg_toast_2619_index"
>> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    WARNING:  using index "pg_toast_2619_index"
>> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    WARNING:  using index "pg_toast_2619_index"
>> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    WARNING:  using index "pg_toast_2619_index"
>> despite IgnoreSystemIndexes
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    INFO:  vacuuming
>> "information_schema.sql_implementation_info"
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    INFO:  "sql_implementation_info": found 0
>> removable, 12 nonremovable row versions in 1 out of 1 pages
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    DETAIL:  0 dead row versions cannot be removed
>> yet.
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    There were 1 unused item pointers.
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    0 pages are entirely empty.
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
>> 07/31/12 04:09:57    INFO:  vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_11452"
>>
>>
>> I see the warning generated in systable_beginscan_ordered as a
>> warning, and then it proceeds to do the work anyway.
>>
>> It appears as if this is benign.  Is that the case?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
>   EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>
>   + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice
>


--
Michael Wood <esiotrot@gmail.com>


В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Abhijeet R
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Batch updates to 1 column using python-pgsql in multiple rows
Следующее
От: lsq@nym.hush.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: using index "pg_toast_..." despite IgnoreSystemIndexes