Thank you for the review!
On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 9:15 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've attached a small change to simplify the 0001 patch. Please review it.
LGTM, and I've updated in v9 patches.
> Here are a few comments:
>
> + <listitem>
> + <para>
> + <literal>manual</literal>: The analyze was started by an explicit
>
> For consistency with "started_by" in pg_stat_progress_vacuum, I think
> it's better to start with "The operation was started by".
I think "started_by" in pg_stat_progress_vacuum uses "The vacuum was
started by ...".
> ---
> + <command>ANALYZE</command> or <command>VACUUM (ANALYZE)</command>
> + command.
>
> How about using "... or VACUUM with the ANALYZE option"?
Agreed, I've fixed it.
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center