Re: The tragedy of SQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Nolan
Тема Re: The tragedy of SQL
Дата
Msg-id CAOzAquLE35PVi_jipipktAi-aAG9U36wEuVEk-NWL4b3WMfw4A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
Ответы Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
Список pgsql-general
Of all the languages I wrote in, I think SNOBOL was the most fun to write in, and LISP the least fun.  Control Data assembler language 
programming was probably the most precise, because you could crash the OS with a single mis-placed character, something I did more than once.

In a graduate-level course, we studied ALGOL-68, which had so many things in it that I'm not sure anybody ever actually implemented the full language.  (But then again, has anybody implemented EVERYTHING in the SQL standard?)  

COBOL has strange verbs like 'move corresponding' that could accomplish complicated tasks in a few lines but you have to be careful that you knew what you were asking for!

And I'd take the SQL standard over the CODASYL standard any time!  
--
Mike Nolan

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Roles
Следующее
От: Raymond Brinzer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The tragedy of SQL