Re: [HACKERS] Floating point error

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Maciek Sakrejda
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Floating point error
Дата
Msg-id CAOtHd0BfNOKyCoKm9fniGDL28YRFEu16XK-Hp3prQy5jLoTbVA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Floating point error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Floating point error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Why the discrepancy between
>> default behavior and what pg_dump gets?
>
> Basically, the default behavior is tuned to the expectations of people
> who think that what they put in is what they should get back, ie we
> don't want the system doing this by default:
>
> regression=# set extra_float_digits = 3;
> SET
> regression=# select 0.1::float4;
>    float4
> -------------
>  0.100000001
> (1 row)
>
> regression=# select 0.1::float8;
>        float8
> ---------------------
>  0.10000000000000001
> (1 row)
>
> We would get a whole lot more bug reports, not fewer, if that were
> the default behavior.

Isn't this a client rendering issue, rather than an on-the-wire encoding issue?


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.2 timestamp function syntax error
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Floating point error