Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vaishnavi Prabakaran
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Дата
Msg-id CAOoUkxTO+d2riaLgNEuV1o9t1AKGGY-+GpNRwUbFBZwv6toFbA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

I really do not like calling it "commit" as that conflates with a database commit.

A batch can embed multiple BEGINs and COMMITs. It's entirely possible for an earlier part of the batch to succeed and commit, then a later part to fail, if that's the case. So that name is IMO wrong.

Ok, SendQueue seems ok to me as well. Will change it in next version. 
 


+"a"?

Hmm, Can you explain the question please. I don't understand.

s/of new query/of a new query/


Thanks for explaining. Will change this too in next version. 

Thanks & Regards,
Vaishnavi,
Fujitsu Australia.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage