Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mario Fernando Guerrero Díaz
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication
Дата
Msg-id CAOfUdgfZFNnt2czE+GSEBFFXMtgin1+_GJ0zO8mDCj1vNak0TQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thank you for the clarification. 

El 5/10/2017 9:27 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> escribió:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:30 PM, guedim <guedim@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am working with Postgres9.6 with a Master/Slave cluster replication using
> Streaming replication.
> I would like to add a new Slave server database but this database with
> logical replication .
>
> I tried with some configurations but it was not possible  :(
>
> https://github.com/guedim/postgres-streaming-replication
>
> Here is the image of what is in my mind:
> <http://www.postgresql-archive.org/file/t350419/Database_Replication.png>

This question is really off-topic for this list, which is probably why
you haven't gotten any replies.  This list is for discussion of
PostgreSQL development; there are other lists for user questions, like
pgsql-general.  Logical replication is only supported beginning in
PostgreSQL 10; if you are using some earlier version, you need an
add-on tool like pglogical, slony, etc.

Please also read https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 9.6 Logical and Fisical replication
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Improve bitmap costing for lossy pages