Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Atri Sharma
Тема Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Дата
Msg-id CAOeZVifj=icp8+0TGovWqr3WK7RNqPN5QsRtTrAfo2_1YuAQKw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

 
> If its not the case, the user should be more careful about when he is
> scheduling backups to so that they dont conflict with DDL changes.

That is most certainly the wise choice.

> I am not too comfortable with exposing the locking type to the user. That
> may be just me though.

Why would that be a problem? Hard reasons, please.

Should we genuinely depend on the user's good judgement to decide the locking types?
--
Regards,
 
Atri
l'apprenant

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Следующее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UNION ALL on partitioned tables won't use indices.