Re: Feature request: Optimizer improvement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Atri Sharma
Тема Re: Feature request: Optimizer improvement
Дата
Msg-id CAOeZVicSnXyys5uZ62Q0HbDpHgZ1e=5GjZWO5PSkGkt+YW_+=w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Feature request: Optimizer improvement  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


On Friday, November 1, 2013, Jim Nasby wrote:
On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:57 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
Joe Love <joe@primoweb.com> wrote:

In postgres 9.2 I have a function that is relatively expensive.

What did you specify in the COST clause on the CREATE FUNCTION
statement?

Should that really matter in this case? ISTM we should always handle LIMIT before moving on to the SELECT clause…?

+1

It's sounds straight logical 


--
Regards,
 
Atri
l'apprenant

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Handle LIMIT/OFFSET before select clause (was: Feature request: optimizer improvement)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8573: int4range memory consumption