On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> And we definitely looked at ARC
>
> We didn't just look at it. At least one release used it. Then patent
> issues were raised (and I think the implementation had some contention
> problems).
>
>
> --
> greg
What is the general thinking? Is it time to start testing again and
thinking about improvements to the current algorithm?
Regards,
Atri
--
Regards,
Atri
l'apprenant