Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martin Liška
Тема Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal
Дата
Msg-id CAObPJ3MF7ZHt1HZE0-hvvJBZR431Kdcrw3OOKq0uswvVoX6yiA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Ответы Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal  (Fabien COELHO <fabien.coelho@mines-paristech.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Yes, after the revision I see other failing tests like:
...
     select_having                ... ok           16 ms
     subselect                    ... FAILED       92 ms
     union                        ... FAILED       77 ms
     case                         ... ok           32 ms
     join                         ... FAILED      239 ms
     aggregates                   ... FAILED      136 ms
     transactions                 ... ok           59 ms
...

I'm going to investigate that and will inform you guys.

Martin

On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 11:56, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>
>
> > Yep, I build periodically PostgreSQL package in openSUSE with the latest
> > GCC and so that I identified that and isolated to a simple test-case. I
> > would expect a fix today or tomorrow.
>
> Indeed, the gcc issue reported seems fixed by gcc r278259. I'm updating
> moonjelly gcc to check if this solves pg compilation woes.
>
> --
> Fabien.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Следующее
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата:
Сообщение: [PATCH][BUG FIX] Unsafe access pointers.