Re: Use "protocol options" name instead of "protocol extensions" everywhere

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:51 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> Or keep using "protocol extension" and add a paragraph to the docs to
> say explicitly that there's no support for extensions to create protocol
> extensions. TLS extensions is a good comparison.

Of the three proposed, this last one is my preference. I think it'd be
good to draw very clear lines between the transport level, the
protocol level, and the application level.

Thanks,
--Jacob