Re: Support getrandom() for pg_strong_random() source

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 2:49 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the second item fits better with the current thread's subject.
> Having said that, these two items are somewhat related (for example,
> adding getrandom() support would be a common change for both), so
> perhaps we can start with the pg_strong_random() changes in this
> thread?

Sounds good.

--Jacob