Re: Remove unused function parameters, part 1: contrib

On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 4:13 AM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> This function is already exercised with the tests added in f2464997644c so that
> looks ok to me.
>
> Maybe Jacob or Andrew have some thoughts to share?

Ooh, blast from the past! You've found my very first Postgres review.
I do not remember it at all. :D

Your v2-0005 looks more correct (and less confusing) to me. I'm not
qualified to comment on the historical behavior of citext+collations.

--Jacob