Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOYmi+m7W-2XajSiNAXo6BVnLyU64Shidx0wPb4F==x1YRAppQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:49 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote: > > By adding the new .so to a different package. For example, RPM specs > > would just let you say "hey, this .so I just built doesn't go into the > > main client package, it goes into an add-on that depends on the client > > package." It's the same way separate client and server packages get > > generated from the same single build of Postgres. > > Do we have any idea how many packagers are interested in doing this? I'm not sure how to answer this. The primary drivers from the dev side are you and Tom, I think. Christoph seems to be on board with a split as long as we don't make his life harder. Wolfgang appears to be a packager who would not make use of a split (and in fact cannot). --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: