Re: Time to drop RADIUS support?
| От | Jacob Champion |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Time to drop RADIUS support? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOYmi+kwVHbra-80wSC7Rh9OGttdd8QFV+VcBtSNkEkux6XkyQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Time to drop RADIUS support? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Time to drop RADIUS support?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 8:30 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I don't think removing it entirely from all back branches is a good > > idea, without first making sure that there are no users. > > Agreed, we can't pull it from the back branches. But I'm in favor of > pulling it from HEAD if we document how to use PAM-based RADIUS > instead. I agree with Thomas' argument that the cost-benefit ratio > of fixing our implementation would be poor. +1. I still think a WARNING in the back branches would be a kindness, to let people know that they need to move. --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: