Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOYmi+kgxzP3zK0LRhyZamSG91U=1aucqOGbi+r+o5KRuH5ctw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 1:13 PM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote: > Uhm, so far the plan was to have one "libpq-oauth" package, not several. I think the system is overconstrained at that point. If you want to support clients that delay-load the ABI they're compiled against, _and_ have them continue to work seamlessly after the system has upgraded the ABI underneath them, without restarting the client... is there any option other than side-by-side installation? > Since shipping a single libpq5.deb package for all PG majors has worked well > for the past decades, I wouldn't want to complicate that now. I'm not sure if it's possible to ship a client-side module system without something getting more complicated, though... I'm trying hard not to overcomplicate it for you, but I also don't think the complexity is going to remain the same. --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: