Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jacob Champion
Тема Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Дата
Msg-id CAOYmi+kMctMbBHUTRhHgyxizr9nydm=rOk+N45VhZQ7AzNx8qA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>)
Ответы Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:32 AM Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de> wrote:
> This means that shipping another .so file will not happen with this approach. Assuming OAuth will be picked up by
someof the bigger providers, that would... make me feel quite bad about it, actually. 

It occurs to me that I didn't respond to this point explicitly. I
would like to avoid making your life harder.

Would anybody following along be opposed to a situation where
- dynamiclib builds go through the dlopen() shim
- staticlib builds always rely on statically linked symbols

Or do we need to be able to mix and match?

--Jacob



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: