Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
| От | Jacob Champion |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOYmi+=gxXx1a7s3805TjGKAugxLOuj6vpQZOjS0=zEcfHUyuQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 3:05 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > Personally, I'm not even a fan of the -Dssl/--with-ssl system. I'm more > attached to --with-openssl. But if you want to stick with that, a more > suitable naming would be something like, say, --with-httplib=curl, which > means, use curl for all your http needs. Because if we later add other > functionality that can use some http, I don't think we want to enable or > disable them all individually, or even mix different http libraries for > different features. In practice, curl is a widely available and > respected library, so I'd expect packagers to be just turn it all on > without much further consideration. Okay, I can see that. I'll work on replacing --with-builtin-oauth. Any votes from the gallery on --with-httplib vs. --with-libcurl? The other suggestions look good and I've added them to my personal TODO list. Thanks again for all the feedback! --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: