Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jacob Champion
Тема Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Дата
Msg-id CAOYmi+=8T_rDi3SnnPOqG0h5SP8og1d1KnkHpHLDuj3gtm=cHA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
Ответы Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 8:34 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> I agree with this reasoning and retract my suggestion to rename the option.

(Thank you for chiming in; having the packager feedback has been
extremely helpful.)

While I have you, may I ask whether you're okay (from the packager
perspective) with the current division of dynamic and static
behaviors?

Dynamic: --with-libcurl builds a runtime-loadable module, and if you
don't install it, OAuth isn't supported (i.e. it's optional)
Static: --with-libcurl builds an additional linkable staticlib, which
you must link into your application (i.e. not optional)

I want to make absolutely sure the existing packager requests are not
conflicting. :D

Thanks,
--Jacob



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: