Thank you very much! Appreciated
2016-10-06 19:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Marco Colombo <ing.marco.colombo@gmail.com> writes:
> > Hi, are information provided sufficient to reproduce the problem?
>
> I think you're hoping for a feature that doesn't exist, and is unlikely to
> do so anytime soon. The INSERT ... ON CONFLICT clause describes what to
> do in case the unique constraint on table dh_1 is violated. But it isn't,
> since indeed no insert into dh_1 happens at all. Some other constraint on
> some other table is being violated. The fact that that other insert is
> being driven from an ON-INSERT trigger belonging to dh_1 isn't enough to
> make a connection --- after all, that trigger could do anything at all.
>
> If we had a true partitioning feature where the connection between the
> table insertions was hardwired into the system (rather than emerging from
> user-written triggers) and the partitions were all guaranteed to have
> identical unique constraints, then it would be reasonable to expect INSERT
> ... ON CONFLICT to handle conflicts within the partitions. But we're
> still some ways away from having that.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Ing. Marco Colombo