Re: Ignore hash indices on replicas
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Ignore hash indices on replicas |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOR=d=19idTXka8_uFonhwOWOcRNmX3qeHTM+7ZzWp7Pv+K1nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Ignore hash indices on replicas (Steven Schlansker <steven@likeness.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Ignore hash indices on replicas
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Steven Schlansker <steven@likeness.com> wrote: > I'm using Postgres hash indices on a streaming replica master. > As is documented, hash indices are not logged, so the replica does not have access to them. > > I understand that the current wisdom is "don't use hash indices", but (unfortunately?) I have benchmarks that > show that our particular application is faster by quite a bit when a hash index is available. You could use a slony slave and have different indexes etc between master and slave but it's more complex to setup, maintain and monitor for most people.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: