Re: Index on integer or on string field
От | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index on integer or on string field |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOR=d=0bvy4a3EGMk1Ogd533rO2CTrN510fbrsaEdP3P+S=M4w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Index on integer or on string field (Job <Job@colliniconsulting.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index on integer or on string field
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Job <Job@colliniconsulting.it> wrote: > Hello, > > i have a table of about 10 millions of records, with the index on a string field. > Actually is alphabetical; since queries are about 100/200 per seconds, i was looking for a better way to improve performanceand reduce workload. > > The unique values, of that fields, are about the 50 (category name), and we could create a second table to codify, withnumerical integer values, the 50 recurring names. > > Is index are integer and not characteral, performance are better and workload reduces? > > Is there any comparisons? Have you considered using a multi-column index here? if there's a more selective field you could index along with your rather non-selective one that might work better. But it's hard to tell without looking at you database usage etc.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: