Re: Slow query with big tables
| От | Tommi K |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Slow query with big tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOLG3nq-KjLF1S-5Hq3pnE96y6itXi-Sq0_SXJYpeOfxebvLdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Slow query with big tables (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Slow query with big tables
("Mike Sofen" <msofen@runbox.com>)
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Ok, sorry that I did not add the original message. I thought that it would be automatically added to the message thread.
Here is the question again:
Is there way to keep query time constant as the database size grows. Should I use partitioning or partial indexes?
Thanks,
Tommi Kaksonen
> Hello,
>
> I have the following tables and query. I would like to get some help to find out why it is slow and how its performance could be improved.
>
> Thanks,
> Tommi K.
>
>
> --Table definitions---
> CREATE TABLE "Measurement"
> (
> id bigserial NOT NULL,
> product_id bigserial NOT NULL,
> nominal_data_id bigserial NOT NULL,
> description text,
> serial text,
> measurement_time timestamp without time zone,
> status smallint,
> system_description text,
> CONSTRAINT "Measurement_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id),
> CONSTRAINT "Measurement_nominal_data_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (nominal_data_id)
> REFERENCES "Nominal_data" (id) MATCH SIMPLE
> ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION,
> CONSTRAINT "Measurement_product_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (product_id)
> REFERENCES "Product" (id) MATCH SIMPLE
> ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION
> )
> WITH (
> OIDS=FALSE
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX measurement_time_index
> ON "Measurement"
> USING btree
> (measurement_time);
> ALTER TABLE "Measurement" CLUSTER ON measurement_time_index;
>
> CREATE TABLE "Product"
> (
> id bigserial NOT NULL,
> name text,
> description text,
> info text,
> system_name text,
> CONSTRAINT "Product_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id)
> )
> WITH (
> OIDS=FALSE
> );
>
>
> CREATE TABLE "Extra_info"
> (
> id bigserial NOT NULL,
> measurement_id bigserial NOT NULL,
> name text,
> description text,
> info text,
> type text,
> value_string text,
> value_double double precision,
> value_integer bigint,
> value_bool boolean,
> CONSTRAINT "Extra_info_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id),
> CONSTRAINT "Extra_info_measurement_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (measurement_id)
> REFERENCES "Measurement" (id) MATCH SIMPLE
> ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION
> )
> WITH (
> OIDS=FALSE
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX extra_info_measurement_id_index
> ON "Extra_info"
> USING btree
> (measurement_id);
>
> CREATE TABLE "Feature"
> (
> id bigserial NOT NULL,
> measurement_id bigserial NOT NULL,
> name text,
> description text,
> info text,
> CONSTRAINT "Feature_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id),
> CONSTRAINT "Feature_measurement_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (measurement_id)
> REFERENCES "Measurement" (id) MATCH SIMPLE
> ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION
> )
> WITH (
> OIDS=FALSE
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX feature_measurement_id_and_name_index
> ON "Feature"
> USING btree
> (measurement_id, name COLLATE pg_catalog."default");
>
> CREATE INDEX feature_measurement_id_index
> ON "Feature"
> USING hash
> (measurement_id);
>
>
> CREATE TABLE "Point"
> (
> id bigserial NOT NULL,
> feature_id bigserial NOT NULL,
> x double precision,
> y double precision,
> z double precision,
> status_x smallint,
> status_y smallint,
> status_z smallint,
> difference_x double precision,
> difference_y double precision,
> difference_z double precision,
> CONSTRAINT "Point_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id),
> CONSTRAINT "Point_feature_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (feature_id)
> REFERENCES "Feature" (id) MATCH SIMPLE
> ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION
> )
> WITH (
> OIDS=FALSE
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX point_feature_id_index
> ON "Point"
> USING btree
> (feature_id);
>
> CREATE TABLE "Warning"
> (
> id bigserial NOT NULL,
> feature_id bigserial NOT NULL,
> "number" smallint,
> info text,
> CONSTRAINT "Warning_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id),
> CONSTRAINT "Warning_feature_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (feature_id)
> REFERENCES "Feature" (id) MATCH SIMPLE
> ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION
> )
> WITH (
> OIDS=FALSE
> );
>
> CREATE INDEX warning_feature_id_index
> ON "Warning"
> USING btree
> (feature_id);
>
>
> ---Query---
> SELECT
> f.name,
> f.description,
> SUM(CASE WHEN p.status_x = 0 AND p.status_y = 0 AND p.status_z = 0 AND warning.id IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS green_count,
> SUM(CASE WHEN p.status_x = 0 AND p.status_y = 0 AND p.status_z = 0 AND warning.id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS green_warned_count,
> SUM(CASE WHEN NOT (p.status_x = 0 AND p.status_y = 0 AND p.status_z = 0) AND NOT (p.status_x = 2 OR p.status_y = 2 OR p.status_z = 2) AND warning.id IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS yellow_count,
> SUM(CASE WHEN NOT (p.status_x = 0 AND p.status_y = 0 AND p.status_z = 0) AND NOT (p.status_x = 2 OR p.status_y = 2 OR p.status_z = 2) AND warning.id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS yellow_warned_count,
> SUM(CASE WHEN (p.status_x = 2 OR p.status_y = 2 OR p.status_z = 2) AND warning.id IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS red_count,
> SUM(CASE WHEN (p.status_x = 2 OR p.status_y = 2 OR p.status_z = 2) AND warning.id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS red_warned_count,
> SUM(CASE WHEN (p.status_x = 1000 OR p.status_y = 1000 OR p.status_z = 1000) AND warning.id IS NOT NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS unable_to_measure_count
> FROM "Point" p
> JOIN "Feature" f ON f.id = p.feature_id
> JOIN "Measurement" measurement ON measurement.id = f.measurement_id
> JOIN "Product" product ON product.id = measurement.product_id
> LEFT JOIN "Warning" warning ON f.id = warning.feature_id
> WHERE (product.name ILIKE 'Part 1') AND
> measurement.measurement_start_time >= '2015-06-18 17:00:00' AND
> measurement.measurement_start_time <= '2015-06-18 18:00:00' AND
> measurement.id NOT IN(SELECT measurement_id FROM "Extra_info" e
> WHERE e.measurement_id = measurement.id AND e.description = 'Clamp' AND e.value_string ILIKE 'Clamped%')
> GROUP BY f.name, f.description;
>
>
> ---Explain Analyze---
> GroupAggregate (cost=1336999.08..1337569.18 rows=5562 width=33) (actual time=6223.622..6272.321 rows=255 loops=1)
> Buffers: shared hit=263552 read=996, temp read=119 written=119
> -> Sort (cost=1336999.08..1337012.98 rows=5562 width=33) (actual time=6223.262..6231.106 rows=26265 loops=1)
> Sort Key: f.name, f.description
> Sort Method: external merge Disk: 936kB
> Buffers: shared hit=263552 read=996, temp read=119 written=119
> -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..1336653.08 rows=5562 width=33) (actual time=55.792..6128.875 rows=26265 loops=1)
> Buffers: shared hit=263552 read=996
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..1220487.17 rows=5562 width=33) (actual time=55.773..5910.852 rows=26265 loops=1)
> Buffers: shared hit=182401 read=954
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..22593.53 rows=8272 width=27) (actual time=30.980..3252.869 rows=38831 loops=1)
> Buffers: shared hit=972 read=528
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..657.24 rows=22 width=8) (actual time=0.102..109.577 rows=103 loops=1)
> Join Filter: (measurement.product_id = product.id)
> Rows Removed by Join Filter: 18
> Buffers: shared hit=484 read=9
> -> Seq Scan on "Product" product (cost=0.00..1.04 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.010..0.019 rows=1 loops=1)
> Filter: (name ~~* 'Part 1'::text)
> Rows Removed by Filter: 2
> Buffers: shared hit=1
> -> Index Scan using measurement_start_time_index on "Measurement" measurement (cost=0.00..655.37 rows=67 width=16) (actual time=0.042..109.416 rows=121 loops=1)
> Index Cond: ((measurement_start_time >= '2015-06-18 17:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (measurement_start_time <= '2015-06-18 18:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
> Filter: (NOT (SubPlan 1))
> Buffers: shared hit=483 read=9
> SubPlan 1
> -> Index Scan using extra_info_measurement_id_index on "Extra_info" e (cost=0.00..9.66 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.900..0.900 rows=0 loops=121)
> Index Cond: (measurement_id = measurement.id)
> Filter: ((value_string ~~* 'Clamped%'::text) AND (description = 'Clamp'::text))
> Rows Removed by Filter: 2
> Buffers: shared hit=479 read=7
> -> Index Scan using feature_measurement_id_and_name_index on "Feature" rf (cost=0.00..993.40 rows=370 width=35) (actual time=28.152..30.407 rows=377 loops=103)
> Index Cond: (measurement_id = measurement.id)
> Buffers: shared hit=488 read=519
> -> Index Scan using point_feature_id_index on "Point" p (cost=0.00..144.80 rows=1 width=14) (actual time=0.067..0.067 rows=1 loops=38831)
> Index Cond: (feature_id = f.id)
> Buffers: shared hit=181429 read=426
> -> Index Scan using warning_feature_id_index on "Warning" warning (cost=0.00..20.88 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.007..0.007 rows=0 loops=26265)
> Index Cond: (f.id = feature_id)
> Buffers: shared hit=81151 read=42
> Total runtime: 6273.312 ms
>
>
> ---Version---
> PostgreSQL 9.2.1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1600, 64-bit
>
>
> ---Table sizes---
> Extra_info 1223400 rows
> Feature 185436000 rows
> Measurement 500000 rows
> Point 124681000 rows
> Warning 11766800 rows
>
> ---Hardware---
> Intel Core i5-2320 CPU 3.00GHz (4 CPUs)
> 6GB Memory
> 64-bit Operating System (Windows 7 Professional)
> WD Blue 500GB HDD - 7200 RPM SATA 6 Gb/s 16MB Cache
>
> ---History---
> Query gets slower as more data is added to the database
>
> ---Maintenance---
> Autovacuum is used with default settings
>
> Tommi Kaksonen <t2nn2t(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > ---Version---
> > PostgreSQL 9.2.1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1600, 64-bit
>
> current point release for 9.2 is 9.2.18, you are some years behind.
>
> The plan seems okay for me, apart from the on-disk sort: increase
> work_mem to avoid that.
>
> If i where you i would switch to PG 9.5 - or wait for 9.6 and parallel
> execution of aggregates.
>
>
>
> Regards, Andreas Kretschmer
> --
> Andreas Kretschmer
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hello,
> thanks for the response. I did not get the response to my email even though I am subscribed to the pgsql-performance mail list. Let's hope that I get the next one :)
>
> Increasing work_mem did not have great impact on the performance. But I will try to update the PostgreSQL version to see if it speeds up things.
>
> However is there way to keep query time constant as the database size grows. Should I use partitioning or partial indexes?
>
> Best Regards,
> Tommi Kaksonen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please include the email you are replying to when you respond. It saves
> everyone time if they don't have to dig up your old emails, and many of us
> discard old emails anyway and have no idea what you wrote before.
>
> Craig
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: