Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Beena Emerson
Тема Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Дата
Msg-id CAOG9ApFvQpJE1DPqwkcC8gd69hoAxPdz0kmK5FBNOLbGLG9Jpg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Amit,

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/08/05 2:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Concretely, my proposal is:
>>
>> P.S. While I haven't reviewed 0002 in detail, I think the concept of
>> minimizing what needs to be built in RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo
>> is a very good idea.
>
> I put this patch ahead in the list and so it's now 0001.
>

FYI, 0001 patch throws the warning:

execMain.c: In function ‘ExecSetupPartitionTupleRouting’:
execMain.c:3342:16: warning: ‘next_ptinfo’ may be used uninitialized
in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]    next_ptinfo->parentid != ptinfo->parentid)

--

Beena Emerson

EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Следующее
От: Oliver Ford
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Fix number skipping in to_number