Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Julien Rouhaud
Тема Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements
Дата
Msg-id CAOBaU_bT7yU7sLHMhf+PSaV9W+q9Lp6OUfCXFRCdQ2jPf0bJmw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Obsolete comment in pg_stat_statements
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 14 Sept 2024, 12:39 Tom Lane, <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> While adapting in pg_stat_kcache the fix for buggy nesting level calculation, I
> noticed that one comment referencing the old approach was missed.  Trivial
> patch attached.

Hmm ... I agree that para is out of date, but is there anything to
salvage rather than just delete it?

I thought about it but I think that now that knowledge is in the else branch, with the mention that we still have to bump the nesting level even if it's not locally handled. 
 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: