Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Julien Rouhaud
Тема Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Дата
Msg-id CAOBaU_YX-4zWAN7BEebWxNsXBdL1W-vbCGW=xnEW6tpOwed-tA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:44 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> David Rowley wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 02:06, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2/25/19 1:17 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 9:42 PM David Rowley
> > > > <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > >> The current default vacuum_cost_limit of 200 seems to be 15 years old
> > > >> and was added in f425b605f4e.
> > > >>
> > > >> Any supporters for raising the default?
> > [...]
> > I'll add this to the March commitfest and set the target version as PG12.
>
> I think this is a good move.
>
> It is way easier to recover from an over-eager autovacuum than from
> one that didn't manage to finish...

+1


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Следующее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Referential Integrity Checks with Statement-level Triggers