Re: Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner?
| От | Julien Rouhaud |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAOBaU_YTCkze7qJSZXWzzrWXbJRez1Qgf7wgt8yik0kj1rThMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Have we tried to treat CTE as SubQuery in planner? (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 2:04 PM Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi: > > Take the following example: > > insert into cte1 select i, i from generate_series(1, 1000000)i; > create index on cte1(a); > > explain > with cte1 as (select * from cte1) > select * from c where a = 1; > > It needs to do seq scan on the above format, however it is pretty > quick if we change the query to > select * from (select * from cte1) c where a = 1; > > I know how we treat cte and subqueries differently currently, > I just don't know why we can't treat cte as a subquery, so lots of > subquery related technology can apply to it. Do we have any > discussion about this? See https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=608b167f9f9c4553c35bb1ec0eab9ddae643989b
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: