Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 1:42 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I've edited the whole, added this extra test based on \syncpipeline in
> 17~, kept the remaining tests in 14~ where pgbench is able to handle
> them, and backpatched that down to 13.  Let's see now what we can do
> with the psql bits.

Thanks!

> Anthonin, now that the original problem is solved, could you create a
> new thread with your new proposal for psql?  That would attract a
> better audience for reviews.

Yes, I will rebase and start the dedicated thread for the pipeline
support in psql.