Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ron Johnson
Тема Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
Дата
Msg-id CANzqJaDocQZNhD8CpGS7ae82tVeuL5-reoKy0_Y6=RKuTh6qwQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:25 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> writes:
> But wouldn't it be good that VACUUM FULL uses that index defined by
> Cluster, if it exists ?

No ... what would be the difference then?
 
What the VACUUM docs "should" do, it seems, is suggest CLUSTER on the PK, if the PK is a sequence (whether that be an actual sequence, or a timestamp or something else that grows monotonically).

That's because the data is already roughly in PK order.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CLUSTER vs. VACUUM FULL