Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANzqJaD0+Mex1tCj6i0SbQK0Z3urqYYN5GUC=7PntGe4DNVgtQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table (Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 1:32 PM Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net> wrote:
Hello list.
My database includes one table with 1000 partitions, all of them rather
sizeable. I run:
pg_restore -j12 --no-tablespaces --disable-triggers --exit-on-error --no-owner --no-privileges -n public -d newdb custom_format_dump.pgdump
Right now after 24h of restore, I notice weird behaviour, so I have
several questions about it:
+ 11 postgres backend processes are sleeping as "TRUNCATE TABLE waiting".
I see that they are waiting to issue a TRUNCATE for one of the
partitions and then COPY data to it. Checking the log I see that
several partitions have already been copied finished, but many more
are left to start.
Why is a TRUNCATE needed at the start of a partition's COPY phase? I
didn't issue a --clean on the command line (I don't need it as my
database is newly created), and I don't see a mention of related
TRUNCATE in the pg_restore manual.
TRUNCATE statements inside of "toc.dat" files? I'm skeptical.
Are you maybe doing something else in that database besides pg_restore?
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: