Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another...
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANzqJaAysH3-+1vMBuUnOBc98=ko5-DuKDESoTXb13SAVjxjqw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... (Jim Vanns <jvanns@ilm.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another...
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
PG 15.0 or 15.7?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:58 PM Jim Vanns <jvanns@ilm.com> wrote:
Sorry, PG15.JimOn Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:25, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:On 8/1/24 12:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Vanns <jvanns@ilm.com> writes:
>> I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name -
>> 'foobar'. Why would a vacuum of 'foobar' from one session block the vacuum
>> of 'foobar' in the other session?
>
> That's fairly hard to believe. Can you provide a self-contained test
> case?
Would also be nice to know what version of Postgres and where you are
running the server?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com--Jim Vanns
Principal Production Engineer
Industrial Light & Magic, London
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: