Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement
| От | Akshay Joshi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANxoLDfw=ERY89RR08s+qXwgUQvLCFF0pVG_e0fDT14rwZsWRg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement (Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Hackers,
Make the pretty flag a default parameter by adding CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION in system_functions.sql.
Attached is the v7 patch, which is ready for review.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 5:17 PM Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi Hackers,
Added a new#define GET_DDL_PRETTY_FLAGSbecause the existing#define GET_PRETTY_FLAGSis not suitable for formatting reconstructed DDLs. The existing #define GET_PRETTY_FLAGS always indents the code, regardless of whether the flag is set totrueorfalse, which is not the desired behavior forpg_get_<object>_ddlfunctions.
Updated the logic of theget_formatted_stringfunction based on Tim Waizenegger’s suggestion.
I am attaching the new v6 patch, which is ready for review.On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 3:08 PM Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Thanks, Mark, for your review comments and the updated patch.
I’ve incorporated your changes and prepared a combined v5 patch. The v5 patch is attached for further review.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:15 PM Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com> wrote:Hi everyone,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:47:53PM +0530, Akshay Joshi wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:55 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this patch before and provided a number of comments that
> have been addressed by Akshay (so I encourage you to list my name and
> this address in a Reviewed-by trailer line in the commit message). One
> thing I had not noticed is that while this function has a "pretty" flag,
> it doesn't use it to pass anything to pg_get_expr_worker()'s prettyFlags
> argument, and I think it should -- probably just
>
> prettyFlags = GET_PRETTY_FLAGS(pretty);
>
> same as pg_get_querydef() does.
Kinda sorta similar thought, I've noticed some existing functions like
pg_get_constraintdef make the "pretty" flag optional, so I'm wondering
if that scheme is also preferred here.
I've attached a small diff to the original
0001-Add-pg_get_policy_ddl-function-to-reconstruct-CREATE.patch to
illustrate the additional work to follow suit, if so desired.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Wong <markwkm@gmail.com>
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: