Re: storing an explicit nonce

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ants Aasma
Тема Re: storing an explicit nonce
Дата
Msg-id CANwKhkOnfjzD9e64d3f3tQu5dxOpUAUGRDr0znooXf2VKYMPig@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 23:08, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
Yes, I would prefer we don't use the LSN.  I only mentioned it since
Ants Aasma mentioned LSN use above.

Is there a particular reason why you would prefer not to use LSN? I suggested it because in my view having a variable tweak is still better than not having it even if we deem the risks of XTS tweak reuse not important for our use case. The comment was made under the assumption that requiring wal_log_hints for encryption is acceptable.

--
Ants Aasma
Senior Database Engineer
www.cybertec-postgresql.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: storing an explicit nonce
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: storing an explicit nonce