Re: spin_delay() for ARM

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ants Aasma
Тема Re: spin_delay() for ARM
Дата
Msg-id CANwKhkMRJ2S+9QGWVOVrJ_U5gTYtQQqjue4z1kHUdUUntuFZ0Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: spin_delay() for ARM  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: spin_delay() for ARM
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 10:33, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> what I know, pgbench cannot be used for testing spinlocks problems.
>
> Maybe you can see this issue when a) use higher number clients - hundreds, thousands. Decrease share memory, so there
willbe press on related spin lock.
 

There really aren't many spinlocks left that could be tickled by a
normal workload. I looked for a way to trigger spinlock contention
when I prototyped a patch to replace spinlocks with futexes. The only
one that I could figure out a way to make contended was the lock
protecting parallel btree scan. A highly parallel index only scan on a
fully cached index should create at least some spinlock contention.

Regards,
Ants Aasma



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 001_rep_changes.pl stalls
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications