Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
| От | Michail Nikolaev |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANtu0ojwFcSQpyCxrGxJuLVTnOBSSrzKuF3cB_yCk0U-X-wpGw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby (Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby
Re: [PATCH] Full support for index LP_DEAD hint bits on standby |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, everyone.
Oh, I just realized that it seems like I was too naive to allow
standby to set LP_DEAD bits this way.
There is a possible consistency problem in the case of low
minRecoveryPoint value (because hint bits do not move PageLSN
forward).
Something like this:
LSN=10 STANDBY INSERTS NEW ROW IN INDEX (index_lsn=10)
<-----------minRecoveryPoint will go here
LSN=20 STANDBY DELETES ROW FROM HEAP, INDEX UNTACHED (index_lsn=10)
REPLICA SCANS INDEX AND SET hint bits (index_lsn=10)
INDEX IS FLUSHED (minRecoveryPoint=index_lsn=10)
CRASH
On crash recovery, a standby will be able to handle queries after
LSN=10. But the index page contains hints bits from the future
(LSN=20).
So, need to think here.
Thanks,
Michail.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: