On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:53 PM, François Beausoleil
<francois@teksol.info> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've found an old thread on OpenVZ:
>
> (2008): http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-03/msg00076.php
>
> And a more recent question that scared me a bit:
>
> (2011): http://serverfault.com/questions/281783/running-mongodb-with-openvz
>
> On the PostgreSQL general mailing list, I've only found 54 results when searching for OpenVZ. I'm wondering if OpenVZ
issimply unpopular, or not used at all for PG. What experiences do you have with OpenVZ? Any performance problems?
>
> We're buying bare metal to run our clusters on, and the supplier is late delivering the machines. They suggested
lendingus a machine and run PostgreSQL under OpenVZ. When the real hardware is ready, we'd migrate the VZ over to the
newphysical servers. Thoughts on this?
>
> I have no experience with OpenVZ itself, so if you have general comments about it's stability and/or performance,
evenunrelated to PostgreSQL, I'd appreciate.
I run all my PG productions/tests servers on openvz, you just have to
be careful to have swap activated, and SHMPAGES tuned, as well as
SHMMAX.
Otherwise it runs like a charm.
--
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."