Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms

Поиск

Список

Период

Сортировка

От	Yuriy Zhuravlev
Тема	Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Дата	20 апреля 2018 г. 06:30:21
Msg-id	CANiD2e_aN7-ps-darPMJ5BpUyCj7Sj3OjEh8EJp3uCFUKFqsBg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на	Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список	pgsql-hackers

My gut reaction to Catalin's list is that requiring C+11 is a pretty
darn high bar to clear for older platforms.

It's only for latest version and we can support version 3.9 with C++98 I think at least 5 years.

3.9.6 was realease in November 10, 2017 .

That's a pretty big shift from the project's traditional
mindset.

Sure, but I think time to time it should be happen.

But to me it's a significant minus that we'd have to set against whatever
pluses are claimed for a move.

It's obvious minuses but I still can't understand your position on this question.

Regards

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата: 20 апреля 2018 г., 06:14:14
Сообщение: Re: Built-in connection pooling

От: Amit Langote
Дата: 20 апреля 2018 г., 06:48:50
Сообщение: Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions