Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nikhil Sontakke
Тема Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?
Дата
Msg-id CANgU5ZfUvsfK-km7kOS+ThxheykU_jWsdD1u9PUC2m_dXxoO0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

>>Any preferences for the name?
>> connoinh
>> conisonly
>> constatic or confixed
>
> I'd probably pick conisonly from those choices.
>

The use of "\d" inside psql will show ONLY constraints without any
embellishments similar to normal constraints. E.g.


ALTER TABLE ONLY a ADD CONSTRAINT achk CHECK (FALSE);

ALTER TABLE a ADD CONSTRAINT bchk CHECK (b > 0);

psql=# \d a      Table "public.a"Column |  Type   | Modifiers
--------+---------+-----------b      | integer |
Check constraints:   "achk" CHECK (false)   "bchk" CHECK (b > 0)

Is this acceptable? Or we need to put in work into psql to show ONLY
somewhere in the description? If yes, ONLY CHECK sounds weird, maybe
we should use LOCAL CHECK or some such mention:

Check constraints:   "achk" LOCAL CHECK (false)   "bchk" CHECK (b > 0)

Regards,
Nikhils


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XMLATTRIBUTES vs. values of type XML
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?