On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > JSON parsing reports the line number and relevant context info
> > incorrectly when the JSON contains newlines. Current code mostly just
> > says "LINE 1" and is misleading for error correction. There were no
> > tests for this previously.
>
> Couple thoughts:
>
> * I think you are wrong to have removed the line number bump that
> happened when report_json_context advances context_start over a
> newline. The case is likely harder to get to now, but it can still
> happen can't it? If it can't, we should remove that whole stanza.
OK, I'm playing around with this to see what is needed.
> * I'd suggest naming the new JsonLexContext field "pos_last_newline";
> "linefeed" is not usually the word we use for this concept. (Although
> actually, it might work better if you make that point to the char
> *after* the newline, in which case "last_linestart" might be the
> right name.)
Yes, OK
> * I'm not enthused about back-patching. This behavior seems like an
> improvement, but that doesn't mean people will appreciate changing it
> in stable branches.
OK, as you wish.
Thanks for the review, will post again soon with an updated patch.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/