Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 03:10, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 08:20, Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> > Temp tables are actually easier, since we don't need any of the
> > concurrency features we get with lazy vacuum.

> Thoughts?

New patch, which does this, when in a xact block

1. For temp tables, only VACUUM FULL is allowed
2. For persistent tables, an AV task is created to perform the vacuum,
which eventually performs a vacuum

The patch works, but there are various aspects of the design that need
input. Thoughts?

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/