Re: GiST README typos
| От | John Naylor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: GiST README typos |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANWCAZbq_Sz6n9Fpcd+DAbfn-BGkJ31XipNXuObSuLGYRYoKJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | GiST README typos (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: GiST README typos
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 1:19 PM Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: > Here are fixes to a few typos I found in the GiST README. the child might have migrated as a result of concurrent splits of the -parent, gistFindCorrectParent() is used to find the parent page. +parent, so gistFindCorrectParent() is used to find the parent page. -buffer attached to them. When a tuple is inserted at the top, the descend down +buffer attached to them. When a tuple is inserted at the top, the descent down LGTM being empty. Whenever we find one, we acquire a lock on the parent and child -page, re-check that the child page is still empty. Then, we remove the +page, then re-check that the child page is still empty. Then, we remove the downlink and mark the child as deleted, and release the locks. I still find this a bit awkward -- perhaps "and re-check"? The last sentence could do with just the last "and" as well, I think, but that's a style consideration and not a grammar fix. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: