Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
| От | John Naylor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANWCAZbjdFnBiUmrBQC5vFFy0Fnn4SJG4AkkzGpTFhovodJdYQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations (Andrew Kim <tenistarkim@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 8:58 AM Andrew Kim <tenistarkim@gmail.com> wrote: > The removal of the backend-side checksum_backend_lib stanza without an > equivalent dependency path explains the CI breakage clearly, > and your diagnosis makes sense, v10-0003 approach, > splitting the body of checksum_block into a semi-private > implementation header while preserving the externally visible > interface, > that makes sense to me Glad to hear it. > I’m supportive of using v10 as the basis for further discussion and iteration, > cleaning up Meson dependency declarations so generated headers are > properly ordered, > refining the PG_CHECKSUM_INTERNAL usage if needed, Great! It sounds like you've found some issues to address? It's not clear. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: