Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CANWCAZaR_evWtizo63=bkuAaMPH+P=FMCaaqz0PC3rG6mzxw1Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: maintenance_work_mem = 64kB doesn't work for vacuum
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 1:46 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Commit bbf668d66fbf6 (back-patched to v17) lowered the minimum
> maintenance_work_mem to 64kB, but it doesn't work for parallel vacuum

That was done in the first place to make a regression test for a bug
fix easier, but that test never got committed. In any case I found it
worked back in July:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANWCAZZb7wd403wHQQUJZjkF%2BRWKAAa%2BWARP0Rj0EyMcfcdN9Q%40mail.gmail.com

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: