On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 7:16 PM John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW, I see that you applied ed26c4e25 only to master, but don't
> > we want to back-patch? cpluspluscheck is not just an exercise in a
> > vacuum, it's to ensure that C++-coded extensions don't have trouble
> > with our headers.
>
> I was thinking that it was run only when developing new features, not
> for backpatch-able bug fixes, but that's a flawed assumption. I'll
> remedy that soon along with the new symbols above, unless you beat me
> to it.
This is done.
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services