Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
| От | John Naylor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CANWCAZaH7a30cuu+OmM=DKBM_X8A2o=EO9G=zVLDsJTi12nBaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind ("Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 1:08 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote: > While seeing the buildfarm, I found that recently regression test for modules > sometimes failed [1]. Typical example is [2] and failed at simd.h. > The issue happened over branches, and they use gcc experimental. Based on that > I felt recent commits for gcc might be related with. > > I don't have enough knowledge around here, but I saw commits in gcc and listed > Candidates [4], [5], [6]. Can you find something from here? We're not compiler engineers. > Also, what should we do for nightly-built compilers? Will we fix tests or codes for them? We might ask ourselves how often these have resulted in forward-looking fixes for our code, weighed against spurious failures and compiler bugs. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: