Re: Review/Pull Request: Adding new CRC32C implementation for IBM S390X
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review/Pull Request: Adding new CRC32C implementation for IBM S390X |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANWCAZYewJBQDFC9GB_aq5hvtpTU90+GTq+WKJY8CyjF1cfDAg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review/Pull Request: Adding new CRC32C implementation for IBM S390X (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Review/Pull Request: Adding new CRC32C implementation for IBM S390X
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 8:15 PM Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote: > > I didn't review the patch but wanted to point out that when it comes > to performance improvements it's typically useful to provide some > benchmarks. +1 -- It's good to have concrete numbers for the commit message, and also to verify improvement on short inputs. There is a test harness in the v7-0002 patch from here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANWCAZaD5niydBF6q3V_cjApNV05cw-LpxxFtMbwDPLsz-PjbQ@mail.gmail.com After building, run the "test-crc.sh" script here after executing "CREATE EXTENSION test_crc32c;": https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANWCAZahvhE-%2BhtZiUyzPiS5e45ukx5877mD-dHr-KSX6LcdjQ%40mail.gmail.com -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: