Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Félix GERZAGUET
Тема Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable)
Дата
Msg-id CANVwZttLJiG+Z+-zbQ6KxCw+e3dELt6CaOG_x=uBusRBjk7Lvw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable)  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Ответы Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable)  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
On 12/20/15 1:09 PM, Félix GERZAGUET wrote:
After reading
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/wal-reliability.html, I
tried the recommended diskchecker.pl
<http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html> but I am not satisfied:

I always get:
Total errors: 0

even if I tested with with a HGST HTS721010A9E630 that the vendor's
datasheet
(http://www.hgst.com/sites/default/files/resources/TS7K1000_ds.pdf)
advertise as "
Designed for low duty cycle, non mission-critical applications in
PC,nearline and consumer electronics environments, which vary
application to application
"

Since it is not, a high end disk, I expect some errors.

Why? Just because a disk isn't enterprise-grade doesn't mean it has to lie about fsync, which is the only thing diskchecker.pl tests for.

I was thinking that since the disk have a 32M write-cache (with not battery) it would lie to the OS (and postgres) about when data are really on disk (not in the disk write cache). But maybe that thinking was wrong.
 

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Sterpu Victor"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unique index problem
Следующее
От: Bill Moran
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Test disk reliability (or HGST HTS721010A9E630 surprisingly reliable)