Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jLSvPpyT+bWQAwpTcBPYVgEF2tAA8-aArw8G1rhM8QvVA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 8 September 2016 at 10:26, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:

> "k (n1, n2, n3)" == "first k (n1, n2, n3)" doesn't break backward
> compatibility but most users would think "k(n1, n2, n3)" as quorum
> after introduced quorum.
> I wish we can change the s_s_names syntax of 9.6 to "first k(n1, n2,
> n3)" style before 9.6 releasing if we got consensus.

Let's see the proposed patch, so we can evaluate the proposal.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ICU integration